I'd pay to see this...

[Overlord Omega]

Hypothetically, of course.

[omicron27]

First of all, I'm not sure who would FIN in a fight. Secondly, Doctor Who gets one version, tops. Thirdly, there are many better alternatives to Hello Kitty. Lastly, putting Jesus Christ in the vote surely puts things off-kilter, and (in my professional opinion,) gives the thread an ill-taste. Your failed humor is simply remarkably uneducated, incompassionate, and immature; Furthermore, some people may find it generally insulting or degrading to even consider that such an important religious figure be compared to the likes of fictional characters and failed comedy artists. Perhaps instead of spending your time coming up with these ridiculous threads, you should instead wisely allocate your limited time to more suitable activities, such as homework or listening to your parents; But no, here you sit, wastefully reading this inexorably insulting wall of text, listlessly watching as hours go by, and you remain with nothing but your shame and disgrace. People like you disgust me.

Hypothetically indeed.

[Overlord Omega]

First of all, Jesus exists as of now, only in the minds of those who put faith into him, therefore, he's as fictional as any of the other "fictional" characters listed. Secondly, since when did you have any religious affiliation? Thirdly, you waste more time out of any of us, and there fore, you contradict your own morals. And on a final note, you took the time to read this ridiculous thread in the firstplace. No one made you. YOU chose to read it. Threfore, it's YOU that's the time-waster. Not me. Also, you probably wasted more time writing all those irreverant contradictions than I did making the actual thread, so I have no sympathy for you.

[omicron27]

My 'contradictions' are irreverant? I'm going to presume you meant 'irreverent', which still wouldn't make much sense. After all, I was being the antithesis of irreverent. Also of note, is that your definition of a fictional character is completely and inexorably based on skewed human perceptions that rely on improveable sciences, which are hardly what constitutes the defining of a 'fictional' character. For your inquiry, I have been affiliated with religion far before I knew what it truly is, vague as that may sound. Thirdly, your fourth point is simply a regurgitated reiteration of your third and simply adds unneeded weight to your overall paragraph. Also, you use the word 'contradiction' far too liberally, as the closest thing I was to contradicting myself was being a hypocrite. This is not justification to call my hypocracies contradictions, as they are most clearly not. That in and of itself makes your point moot, if the unstability of the rest of your points do not already make that thoroughly clear. Nextly, I would like to emphasize that I am not looking for sympathy for you nor anyone else. Finally I would like to close by saying that this is not a complete waste of time, as you did indeed respond with a well written paragraph to ignite the Jotunheim iteration of argumentation, which is rare these days now that Jof is gone and Eli doesn't care about the pronunciation of 'smilax'.

[Overlord Omega]

To respond to your blathering, mister Seifert, Eli and Geoff have nothing to do with this thread. You just threw their names in here to make your paragraph longer than mine. Secondly, if you do indeed have a close affiliation with a religious background, then why have you not brought it up before? In fact I think it was sixth grade when you told me that you were going to run off and found your own religion based off forgotten legends and rituals listed in some big black book who's title escapes me. And why do you tolerate it when we mock the great unknown that you choose to beilive in? Thirdly, you could argue that the Christian God is fictional. The aithiests and the Bhuddists do it all the time. Therefore, one could argue that his SON if fictional, for if there is no father, there can surely be no son. And lastly. about my redundance in bringing up the whole contradiction matter, it is a respected move used by all sorts of political sleezeballs to get more money out of the working class in this nation of ours. Sure it's wrong, but it works and that's what counts. You just happen to be intelligent enough to see through the muse.

[Overlord Delta]

You spelt Jon Talbain wrong.......and it is smilax (with a long i)

[omicron27]

I <3 this thread.

[Overlord Omega]

me2

[Overlord Artemis]

I particularly appreciated the paragraph indicating that omega could use her time more efficiently by listening to her parents.

Thank you Omicron

[Overlord Omega]

Is that ALL you come on here for? To diss me?

[Overlord Gamma (the great)]

Probably, ya...

[omicron27]

You are welcome, Artemis.

Eli and Joff have much to do with this thread. Why else would I choose to allocate my well earned time doing something so impragmatic as attempting to teach you to see yourself from a higher point of view? Simply put, because you are the only one left. These "sleezeballs" you speak of are no worse than you are for reiterating their mistakes. Do you think I lock away all potentialities of humor concerning a fringe topic for that reason alone? One cannot stay serious for eternities, Rebecca, nonetheless a human lifetime. I've never stated that Jesus isn't fictional. I have no way nor any intention of attempting to help you nor anyone else grasp that which you yourself need to open your eyes and see. From my favorite pirate: "God helps those who help themselves."

[Overlord Gamma (the great)]

And which pirate would that be?

[omicron27]

That's on a need-to-know basis.
And I forgot his name. >___>

[Overlord Gamma (the great)]

Wa, waaaaaaa...

[omicron27]

Homard.

[Overlord Gamma (the great)]

Well there you go.