|
Post by Overlord Delta on Nov 30, 2008 0:01:41 GMT -6
Genis? Not GENIUS(!)?
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 1, 2008 20:57:33 GMT -6
Eli, you should know that the words "Genis" and "Genius" can be used interchangebly...I'm dissapointed in u...
|
|
|
Post by omicron27 on Dec 4, 2008 11:25:20 GMT -6
I always thought it was funny when they called Genis Genuis in the ps2 verson. ^^
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 6, 2008 23:43:54 GMT -6
Hey Geoff, glad you decided to yank you head out of your ass and log on. I like the new profile. Very smexy. It's a pity that you're not in the one act. What with your me, myself and I, I think you'd fit nicely.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 8, 2008 20:41:22 GMT -6
"Ha...ha...and ha." But I get the point...but define "smexy"
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 8, 2008 21:49:50 GMT -6
Smexy? Well... it's borders on being cute and sexy.
There's a whole PH Scale on attractiveness degrees, but I won't bore you with it.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 8, 2008 22:56:54 GMT -6
Please do, I'm bored as it is. Also, there is no "m" in "cute" or "sexy"...
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 9, 2008 1:15:16 GMT -6
Well...
On one side, you have "Adorable". "Adorable" is like what you would describe a baby as or a puppy or something. Girlishly cute and cuddly.
On the other side of the spectrum, you have "stud". Which is used mainly to describe tough-looking men.
The order from "adorable" to "stud" goes as follows: --------------------------------------------------
(adorable, sweet, cute, smexy, sexy, pretty, hot, handsome, stud-muffin, stud) --------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Post by akikowolf on Dec 9, 2008 15:13:12 GMT -6
Very interesting, indeed. Except most people I know who say smexy say it because they're uncomfortable saying sexy.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 9, 2008 16:50:27 GMT -6
That too, I suppose.
I always thought "smexy" was cuter than "sexy". There's a difference in tone.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 9, 2008 20:16:06 GMT -6
In my mind, sexy would come for sure after pretty, and would be debatable between it, hot, and handsome, so it would at least look something more like this: (adorable, sweet, cute, pretty, smexy, sexy, hot, handsome, stud-muffin, and stud), in fact, I would toss handsome out cuz that's far more formal than any of the other ones, and between sexy and hot it would depend on how it is said, but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 9, 2008 20:59:43 GMT -6
Well I still think that it's BECAUSE of "handsome" and it's formality that makes it fill in a gap of sorts. (ie, too soft to be a stud, but too manly to be cute. Some guys can just be described as nothing BUT handsome.)
Question, would you say that this chart works the same way for women? I wouldn't know.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Jan 1, 2009 18:01:31 GMT -6
Well, if you replace "handsome" with something else like "ravishing" or "beautiful"...but I'm not sure what you would replace "sud" and "stud-muffin" with...maybe "jaw droppin' gorgeous" or something like that, and there are different levels of "hot" depending on how you say it.
|
|
|
Post by omicron27 on Jan 14, 2009 21:22:57 GMT -6
Smexy is a combination between smelly and sexy, dood.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Jan 15, 2009 16:55:33 GMT -6
...we went over that defn. a while ago Evan...
|
|
|
Post by omicron27 on Jan 16, 2009 2:01:34 GMT -6
Whatever, dood.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Feb 13, 2009 22:05:36 GMT -6
Whatever...
|
|
|
Post by omicron27 on Feb 25, 2009 19:40:39 GMT -6
dood.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on May 21, 2009 15:54:59 GMT -6
O...k...
|
|