|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 30, 2007 20:03:26 GMT -6
For obvious reasons, THIS is my favorite game of the year. One, it's one of the few video games I kick ass at, and have little competition. Two, i's played on a Wii. Three, it has large animated noses. Four, You can dance all groovalicious-like and not look stupid. And Five, you can control puppies and kittens to form a dancing armada of furry four-legged animals.
I LOVE THAT GAME!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Delta on Dec 31, 2007 11:16:17 GMT -6
But Becca, the dances DO make you look stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 31, 2007 12:51:39 GMT -6
Yep. I agree. The dances make you look stupid, but you just don't feel stupid because you and everyone else are playing a game with stupid things (stupid as in funny stupid), so since everyone knows it has stupid things we can do stupid things without feeling stupid 'cause we all know about it.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Dec 31, 2007 13:36:37 GMT -6
You're right. It's defenatley feeling not stupid, not looking not stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Dec 31, 2007 18:51:22 GMT -6
Was it really neccessary to use that double negative?
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 1, 2008 9:56:03 GMT -6
Yes it was.
A. because it's gramatically correct, if you look. B. because double-negitives PWN all!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Jan 1, 2008 15:46:46 GMT -6
I know that it was correct, but it still seems unessasary. At least to me. I only like to use double-negatives when there's someone around that you can stump with the use of double-negatives. Oh well, no big deal.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 1, 2008 15:54:37 GMT -6
This isn't school, Geoff. Like you said, whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 10:58:07 GMT -6
I do agree with Gamma that the double negative was unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 6, 2008 13:10:16 GMT -6
Oh screw you. I like my double negitives.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 13:33:03 GMT -6
Negatives not negitives.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 6, 2008 14:14:08 GMT -6
IT IS WHAT I SAY IT IS!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 14:21:51 GMT -6
No, it is what Steve says it is.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 14:22:22 GMT -6
Or should I say Steven.
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 6, 2008 14:23:50 GMT -6
Oh my GOD! He's STEVEN?! I thought he was just a myth!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 14:28:35 GMT -6
Oh, he's very real, or WAS REAL!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Omega on Jan 6, 2008 14:52:29 GMT -6
He hasn't gone by that name since before I was born!
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Jan 6, 2008 15:52:37 GMT -6
Isn't this thread suppose to be about Smooth Moves?
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Gamma (the great) on Jan 6, 2008 15:52:55 GMT -6
My freaking God...
|
|
|
Post by Overlord Epsilon on Jan 6, 2008 18:05:14 GMT -6
If you haven't noticed, Gamma, most threads are leading astray the from their original topic.
|
|